ISO
PERSONAL MOTORCYCLE POLICY ANALYSIS
(November 2024)
Part B - Medical Payments Coverage Part C - Uninsured Motorists Coverage Part D - Coverage For Damage To Your Motorcycle |
This is a discussion of Insurance
Services Office's (ISO) Personal Motorcycle Policy (PMP)
The form’s opening section merely
states that payment of applicable premium initiates the vehicle contract as
stated in the sections that follow the Agreement.
This section defines the terms
that are critical to understanding how the policy responds to eligible losses.
The following is a summary of the defined terms:
A. The terms “you” and “your” both
have specific meanings.
1. The policy uses the terms
"you" and "your" in reference to the "named
insured" that appears in the policy declarations.
2. The terms also refer to the named
insured's spouse, but only if that spouse lives in the same household.
Once a spouse is in a different
address or location, he or she still qualifies under the definitions of “you”
and “your” until the earliest of the following:
·
He or she has
been out of the household for 90 days
·
The former
spouse gets his or her own policy where he or she is the named insured
·
The policy
period ends.
Example:
Jake and Nelly, Jake’s wife, are insured under a PMP with a policy term of
6/4/24 to 6/4/25. On 8/7/24, they legally separate and Jake leaves the
insured household (Nelly was the named insured). On 11/27/24, Jake buys and
insures his own cycle. Jake no longer qualifies under the definition of “you”
or “your” when he’s been out of the household for more than 90 days; in this
case, 11/5/24. |
Note: A spouse who becomes a named insured on his or her own policy
is no longer an insured under their former resident spouse’s coverage.
B. The terms "our,"
"us" and "we" mean the company that issues and maintains
the motorcycle policy coverage.
C. The PMP considers a leased motorcycle
(as defined under the policy) to be an owned vehicle if there is a written
lease that covers a period of six months or longer.
D. "Bodily injury" refers
to sickness, disease, or bodily harm. This definition even includes death if it
is a direct result of sickness, disease, or bodily harm.
Example: Morgan, who is covered under a PMP, lost control of his cycle
while turning too quickly at an intersection. He slides off the street, onto
a curb and strikes a pedestrian. The pedestrian sues Morgan for her injuries.
Later, she amends the damages sought when she has to be treated for
infections related to her original injuries. The injuries and infection
qualify as bodily injury. |
|
E. "Business" means any
trade, profession, or occupation. In other words, it is any regular activity
that generates income.
F. A "family member" is any person who is a relative by
blood or by marriage. Any persons who are adopted, wards or foster children
qualify as "family members." However, no person is a family member
unless they reside in the same household as the named insured.
|
Example: Jay jumps on Paul’s motorcycle and attempts to drive it around
the block. He’s never operated a cycle before. He comes up to a stop sign,
panics and accelerates. He jumps off the cycle before it plows into a store’s
display window. Jay’s accident is eligible for coverage under Paul’s PMP because
Paul is Jay’s foster parent. |
Related Court Case: Unlisted Student
Still Part of Driver Household
G. The definition of “motorcycle”
refers to vehicles that are motorized and meet all of the following
requirements:
·
Include a
saddle or seat to accommodate a rider
·
Operate with
a maximum of three wheels that make contact with a travel surface
·
Is intended,
via its equipment and design, to travel over public roads
A sidecar may qualify under the
motorcycle definition. Qualification exists only when a given sidecar is
original equipment that has been installed by the applicable motorcycle’s
manufacturer.
The PMP defines two types of
trailers.
H. Motorcycle cargo trailer
A cargo
trailer is any trailer that is intended, via its design, to be towed by a
vehicle that meets the definition of a motorcycle.
I. Motorcycle transport trailer
A transport trailer
is one that is intended, via its design, to be towed by vehicles other than
motorcycles (including private passenger autos, pickup trucks, and vans) and
which is used to move motorcycles.
|
Note: Due to their distinct purposes,
motorcycle cargo trailers and motorcycle transport trailers are mutually
exclusive under their respective definitions.
J. “Newly acquired motorcycle”
1. This term applies to a motorcycle (including motorcycle cargo or
transport trailers) that the named insured obtains possession of during a given
policy term. A newly acquired item could be either owned or acquired under a
written lease.
Example: Cary’s motorcycle is insured under a PMP with an 8/10/24 to
2/10/25 policy period. On 10/3/24, a friend who is going to live in Europe
for a year leaves his motorcycle in Cary’s care, giving him permission to use
it as he likes. While the friend’s cycle is under |
2. The coverage that is available
for newly acquired motorcycles depends on the type of coverage provided by the PMP.
a. All coverages other than Part
D, Coverage for Damage to Your Motorcycle.
The insured has to report a new
motorcycle no later than 14 days from its acquisition. During those 14 days,
the coverage is equal to the broadest coverage existing for a motorcycle that
appears on the policy declarations.
This part of the policy states
that once coverage is requested (within the 14-day timeframe), coverage only
lasts a maximum of 14 days from the date of the vehicle being owned unless the
insurer agrees, in writing, to provide the coverage.
This policy wording may be problematic,
causing confusion. The point is to cap the coverage period for unreported,
owned motorcycles to a maximum of 14 days. This is not typically an issue
since, in most situations, acquiring a vehicle is a transaction in which
securing insurance coverage is a priority (i.e., loan and leasing arrangements).
However, it is easy to have a situation that would exceed this time period and,
yet still need to be covered by an insurer.
|
Example: Emma has a motorcycle insured
under a PMP. Just before she goes on vacation with a friend, she purchases
another motorcycle. She bought it so her nephew could accompany her on a
10-day road adventure. After returning from her trip, it occurs to her that
she didn’t add the cycle to her policy. She contacts her agent by email. The
email was sent 13 days after the purchase. A couple of days later, (the 15th
after the purchase date), she has an accident with the new cycle. Her insurer
has yet to send confirmation that the cycle has been added. Technically,
coverage would not exist but, practically speaking, it would not make sense
for the insurer to treat this as an uncovered situation. |
b. Coverage for Damage to Your Motorcycle
- Collision
Collision coverage is granted for
a “newly acquired motorcycle” on the date it becomes an owned vehicle. HOWEVER,
the insured MUST report the acquisition:
(1) Within 14 days of becoming the
vehicle's owner when at least one motorcycle on the existing policy appears on
the declarations with collision coverage. The coverage provided is equal to the
broadest coverage existing for a motorcycle that appears on the policy
declarations.
This part of the policy states
that, once coverage is requested (within the 14-day timeframe), coverage only
lasts a maximum of 14 days from the date of the vehicle being owned unless the
insurer agrees, in writing, to provide the coverage.
(2) Within four days after becoming
the vehicle owner if no motorcycle on the existing policy has Collision
Coverage. If the named insured complies within the required timeframe and a
loss occurs before the insured requests coverage (reports the motorcycle) a
Collision deductible of $500 will apply.
This part of the policy states
that, once coverage is requested (within the 4-day timeframe), coverage only
lasts a maximum of 4 days from the date of the vehicle being owned unless the
insurer agrees, in writing, to provide the coverage.
c. Coverage for Damage to Your Motorcycle
- Other Than Collision Coverage
Other than Collision Coverage for
a “newly acquired motorcycle” is available once the vehicle is owned by an
insured, as long as that insured:
(1) Reports
the vehicle within 14 days of acquisition, but only if at least one existing motorcycle
on the policy is rated for Other Than Collision Coverage.
This part of the policy states
that, once coverage is requested (within the 14-day timeframe), coverage only
lasts a maximum of 14 days from the date of the vehicle being owned unless the
insurer agrees, in writing, to provide the coverage.
(2) Reports the motorcycle within
four days of acquisition if no existing (listed) vehicle is rated for Other
Than Collision Coverage. If a loss occurs to a vehicle within the reporting
timeframe (for instance on day three after acquisition) an Other Than Collision
deductible of $500 is in effect.
This part of the policy states
that, once coverage is requested (within the 4-day timeframe), coverage only
lasts a maximum of 4 days from the date of the vehicle being owned unless the
insurer agrees, in writing, to provide the coverage.
d. One policy provision applies
uniformly to all coverages mentioned under policy parts J.2. a., b., and c.
If the named insured fails to
report a vehicle’s acquisition during a policy period, then NO coverage will be
provided ONCE the referenced reporting timeframes are passed. If such a vehicle
is reported AFTER the required reporting timeframes pass, any coverage to which
the insurance company agrees to takes effect on the date on which that vehicle
was actually reported to that insurer. Further, the insurer must agree to
provide that coverage in writing.
K. "Occupying" means in, upon, getting in, getting on,
getting out or getting off.
Example: Lester parks his cycle
outside of a convenience store. He returns to it with his purchases and finds
a young man admiring the bike. The admirer shares that he wants a cycle just
like it and wonders what it’s like to ride on it. Lester offers to take the
admirer on a short ride. The admirer literally jumps onto the cycle, causing
Lester to lose control, and the cycle falls over on them both. Lester is
“occupying” the bike during this situation. |
Related Court Case: Injured Party on Median Is Covered As Car's Occupant
L. "Property damage"
means the loss of use of damage to, or destruction of tangible property.
While this simple definition is
inclusive, it still permits some elements of a loss to be denied.
Related Court Case:
Does Repair Mean Restoration?
M. The definition of “your covered
motorcycle” refers to:
·
Vehicles
that are described in the PMP declarations
·
Vehicles
that an insured acquires after the beginning of the policy period (called
"newly acquired motorcycles")
·
Trailers
that are owned by any named insured. Such trailers must meet the definitions of
either motorcycle cargo or transport trailers AND must appear on the PMP declarations.
·
Motorcycles
and trailers (as defined by the policy) that, while not owned by a named
insured, are used as a substitute for a covered vehicle. However, the
substitution has to be due to the other vehicle being serviced, repaired, lost,
or destroyed.
Example: Neal’s motorcycle is in a
local garage having its engine rebuilt and it will be a week until it’s
ready. The garage lends Neal a motorcycle to use in the meantime. The loaner
cycle is a covered motorcycle. |
A. The PMP covers bodily injury
and/or property damage for which a covered person is legally obligated to pay damages
because of a motorcycle accident. The agreement also obligates an insurer to
defend a claim or lawsuit. However, once the policy's limit of liability has
been exhausted, the insurer's obligation to continue paying to legally defend
an insured ends.
The PMP gives the insurer discretion on
defending against and/or settling a given claim. As it is with standard vehicle
liability policies, the PMP contains the potential of an unlimited defense
obligation. This is due to it not specifying a monetary limit on the amount that
may be paid to defend a covered person. However, the policy does allow a company
to have some control over their financial duty to protect a covered person in a
given claim. Per the insuring agreement, a company does not have to provide a
defense under ALL situations. An insurer doesn’t have to defend any bodily
injury or property damage loss is ineligible for protection.
Example: Hannah loves riding on her
PMP-insured motorcycle, but she often gets upset at car and truck drivers.
One morning, after a driver in a pickup nearly runs her off the road, she
follows the driver. When the other driver parks and exits his pickup, Hannah roars
through the parking lot, intended to scare him. When she applies her brakes,
she loses control, slides and her motorcycle strikes the pickup owner. After
investigating the incident, Hannah’s insurer denies the claim, stating that
the injuries were due to her deliberate action. |
B.
Under Part A
- Liability Coverage, an insured is:
1. The named insured or any family member. They are insured only regarding
the operating, owning, or maintaining of vehicles that quality under the PMP’s
definition of the named insured covered motorcycle.
|
Example: Lisa had an accident involving the child of one of her
neighbors. Lisa noticed some roughness in her motorcycle’s engine during her
latest ride. As soon as she gets off her cycle, she props it against a stand
she uses when servicing it. The 8 year old girl who lives next door runs up
to ask if she can help Lisa. Lisa asks her to get her ratchet set from her
garage. Lisa then allows her to be her “assistant.” When she asks for a tool,
the girl, instead of getting closer to Lisa, reaches out too far to hand it
to her, she loses her balance and falls against the cycle’s still hot engine,
severely burning herself. The girl’s parents later sue Lisa. Lisa is
considered an insured from an incident related to maintaining her cycle. |
2. A person who is using the defined
named insured’s covered motorcycle.
Note: There is no requirement that the
person is operating the motorcycle with permission. The PMP also considers
other persons and organizations to be covered persons under very limited
circumstances.
3. A person or organization that is
considered legally responsible for an omission or act committed by a person
covered under this policy.
This section advises the insured
of several, additional coverages that are available.
1. One supplemental coverage will
pay for the cost of bail bonds, but this coverage is limited to a total of
$250. However, the bond has to be connected with a vehicle accident with
covered bodily injury or property damage. A bond that is due solely to a
traffic violation isn't covered.
2. The policy pays for the costs
of premiums on appeal bonds and attachment bonds, but only those involved in a
suit that the insurance company is defending.
3. The PMP also pays for any
interest on judgments that have been entered. However, any interest payment
obligation ends once an offer to pay the policy's limit of insurance is made.
4. The PMP pays for loss of
earnings caused by hearings or trial attendance and other reasonable expenses
caused by an insurance company's request.
Concerning loss of pay, the PMP
pays a maximum of $250 per day to reimburse a covered person for lost earnings.
This supplemental coverage does not include loss of other sources of income. There
is no other limitation regarding loss of earnings, so the limit could be paid
for one or for a dozen occurrences of lost pay.
5. Finally, under Supplementary Payments, the policy will pay any
reasonable expenses that are due to activity requested of an insured by the
insurer.
Example: Shawna had to meet with her insurance company’s adjuster who
had some questions about her claim. The meeting took nearly two hours. Shawna
was late getting to the other side of town where she had arranged to meet
with a person who wanted to buy tickets to a concert she couldn’t attend.
Shawna requests that the insurer reimburse her for the loss of the chance to
sell her tickets. The insurer rejects that part of her expense claim. |
A very important point is that
any supplemental payments do not reduce the PMP’s other, primary policy limits.
This coverage part's exclusions
fall under category A, having to do with "insureds," and category B,
which concerns vehicle ownership, maintenance, and use.
A.
There are a
number of situations that fail to qualify for liability coverage under the PMP:
1. The Personal Motorcycle Policy
doesn't provide liability protection to insureds that deliberately injure other
persons or property. Because this point sometimes causes confusion, it's important
to examine what is meant by intent.
Related Court Case:
Insurer Not Obligated To Cover Injuries from Intentional Act
2. The PMP excludes coverage for property damage to property that
any insured owns or transports.
Example: Joan collides with a car while
returning from a friend’s house on her motorcycle. Joan’s sidecar hit another
car while Joan was attempting to pass a narrow street. The sidecar is
destroyed as was a friend’s game system that she was borrowing to play at home.
Her insurer pays for the damage to her sidecar but does pay for the game
system. |
3. Any property that an insured
has rented, uses or is caring for is also without protection if damaged or
destroyed. The good news is that an exception is made for damage involving an
insured’s home or garage.
4. This exclusion negates bodily
injury coverage to any person who is hurt while working for an insured.
However, an exception is made for domestic employees who aren’t covered by and
are not required to be covered by workers compensation.
5. If an insured is using a
covered motorcycle to make money by transporting either people or property,
that insured has just made the vehicle ineligible, except if the situation involves
either voluntary or charitable use.
Example: Timmy is a volunteer at his church’s annual festival. The
festival is huge and located on several acres. He helps by taking different
volunteers to their work assignments, using his motorcycle on paths
designated around the festival location. Should he get into an accident, this
use should be one that is eligible for coverage under his PMP. |
Related
Court Case: “Mechanic's Driving Of Customer's Car Held Excluded”
6. This
exclusion takes coverage away from any insured while involved in any “business”
that is NOT ranching or farming.
Example: Paula lives in downtown Bigland, a community that is filled
with businesses that cater to young artists, musicians, etc. Paula owns a
music studio but has a part-time job where she makes meal deliveries. During
one delivery, she is distracted while trying to find an address. She runs a
traffic light and hits a pedestrian. This loss is NOT eligible for coverage
because she’s using the motorcycle in business. |
7. Don’t look for coverage under the PMP unless you’re operating a
covered motorcycle in the belief that you have an insured’s permission.
Note: This standard can be subjective.
This means that evaluation of a loss must include consideration of the
operator’s point of view of regarding their thoughts on whether the motorcycle
was operated with an insured’s permission. Persons who qualify under the policy
as a family member are not subject to this exclusion. The rationale is that
family members will hold a presumption of having permission and prohibiting
coverage under such circumstances fails
to meet the standard of reasonable expectations
Related Court Case: Was Unlicensed
Driver A Permissive Operator?
Example: A newly licensed biker has
been dying to operate her mom’s motorcycle. Her mother has promised to let
her ride the cycle; however, she will be out of town on business for several
days. The daughter thinks it couldn’t do any harm to just start the cycle in
their backyard. She gets the keys, starts it, and hits the accelerator. The
cycle takes off and she and the cycle plows into their neighbors’ backyard
fence. This loss would be eligible for coverage. |
8. No bodily injury or “property
damage” is covered if separate coverage exists (or would exist except for
exhausted limits) under a nuclear energy liability policy issued by three named
sources (Nuclear Energy Liability Insurance Association., Mutual Atomic Energy
Liability Underwriters and Nuclear Insurance Association of Canada) or their
successors.
9. The PMP
specifically excludes coverage for any legal responsibility any insured may
have for operating or owning a vehicle when that vehicle is involved with, even
minor delivery activity. Even food or newspaper delivery activity bars the
insured against the policy’s liability protection.
Note: As is
the case with exclusion A.6., an exception is made for charitable or voluntary
activity.
Example: Sherri is in a collision
while making deliveries to businesses and apartments in her area. However,
the deliveries were of posters, advertising her area’s free community
festival and she volunteered to make the deliveries. This activity would not
be excluded by her PMP. |
B.
These are other situations that are ineligible for coverage.
1. If the vehicle’s main purpose
(design) is for off-road use, it isn’t protected under the PMP. An exception exists
for both motorcycle cargo and transport trailers.
Related
Article: Glossary of Basic Automotive Terms
2. Exclusion B.2 explains that the
PMP is not meant to cover racing exposures. This item bars coverage for
vehicles that are either in the midst of or are preparing for any form of competition
including nonsanctioned skills competitions.
This
exclusion includes an important exception. If an event or training is connected to a
Motorcycle Safety Foundation or any state agency course that is intended to improve
cycle operating skills, coverage still applies if a loss should occur.
C.
Situations involving limited liability protection
The next four exclusions are
unusual because instead of totally excluding coverage they limit coverage to no
more than the applicable state’s financial responsibility law. The applicable
law is considered to be the state where the covered motorcycle is principally
garaged.
1. Any loss that occurs when the
motorcycle is operated by a person who is impaired by the use of either of the
following:
a. Alcohol
b. Any controlled substance
The level of alcohol influence is
based upon the protocol used by authorities in the applicable state where a
loss occurs.
With regard to controlled
substances, the use of any Controlled Substance(s) as defined by the Federal
Food and Drug Law at 21 U.S.C.A. Sections 811 and 812 brings about this
exclusion. Controlled Substances include, but are not limited to:
·
Cocaine
·
LSD
·
Marijuana
·
All narcotic
drugs
This
exclusion makes an exception for any loss involving the legitimate use of
prescription drugs by a person following the orders of a licensed health care professional.
Note: Medical marijuana use has not been tested in court yet. It is a
specifically listed controlled substance and continues to be illegal under the
Federal Food and Drug Law. However, this exclusion’s application in practice will
vary, especially in jurisdictions that permit the use of medicinal marijuana as
well as the states that have legalized marijuana’s use.
2. Any loss in which an insured was
committing a felonious activity and bodily injury or property damage resulted
3. Any loss that occurs when an
insured is operating a motorcycle with the intent to escape capture or arrest
by the authorities
4. Any loss that occurs when an
insured operating the motorcycle does not have a valid driver’s license. A
driver’s permit, with regard to this exclusion, is treated as a valid license.
D.
Ineligible Damages
This policy
only provides compensatory damages (those that reimburse for injury or damage)
NOT to other forms of damage that are often awarded by courts or other
agencies. Therefore, no coverage under the PMP is extended to either punitive
or exemplary damages.
Related
Court Case:
Trucking Firm Not Entitled to Punitive Coverage – Although this is a commercial
auto claim, the case does examine a situation regarding punitive v. compensatory
damages.
A. The monetary limit that appears
on the policy declarations page is the maximum amount of coverage that applies
to the damages from any single motorcycle loss. This maximum is not affected by
the number of vehicles, insureds, or claims involved, or the number of vehicles
or premiums appearing on the declarations page. This arrangement is true of
both bodily injury and property damage claims.
The particulars of a given loss
may well affect how payments may be distributed, but the maximum remains the
maximum.
Example: Polly’s PMP has Bodily Injury
limits of $100,000/$300,000 and Property Damage limits of $100,000. She is in
an accident. Scenario 1:
The claim against Polly involves two persons seriously injured and one
vehicle destroyed. In this instance, the maximum available BI coverage for
the incident is $200,000 and the maximum PD coverage is $100,000. Scenario 2:
The claim against Polly involves five persons seriously injured and three
vehicles seriously damaged. In this instance, the maximum available BI
coverage for the incident is $300,000 and the maximum PD coverage is
$100,000. |
|
B. This section explains that, regardless
of whether protection exists under more than one coverage part (specifically
parts A, B and/or C), no duplicate payments will be made under the PMP. This
limitation means that, even if portions of a single claim qualify for coverage
under Part A - Liability as well as Part B - Medical Payments and/or Part C -
Uninsured Motorists coverage, an insured will not be paid more than once for
any portion of his or her loss. This provision assists in preserving the
policy’s intent to limit compensation to indemnification.
This
Personal Motorcycle Policy provision allows the PMP to respond to a loss
according to a given state’s requirements. Paragraph A.1. of this provision
states that the policy will provide a higher limit for bodily injury or
property damage liability coverage to meet whatever is minimally required by
the state in which a covered loss occurs. Paragraph A.2. explains that the PMP
will comply with the minimum amounts and types of coverages that may be
required by a state’s compulsory insurance law while the covered motorcycle is
being operated in that state.
Paragraph B
of this provision states that no one is eligible for duplicate payments.
This
provision prevents technicalities to bar or limit coverage because of the
different ways that states structure their coverage requirements. The provision
allows travelers to cross state lines without having to worry about making
specific coverage adjustments beforehand.
The PMP, when considered as valid
proof of financial responsibility, is to be interpreted as complying with the
governing financial responsibility law. This is helpful and flexible because financial
obligations required of drivers vary significantly by state.
Related Article: Auto
Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Coverage Requirements
Note: The limits displayed on the
above article usually match the listed states financial responsibility
requirements.
In the event
that other sources of liability insurance exist, Part A-Liability Coverage of
the Personal Motorcycle Policy will pay on a basis that equals its share of the
total amount of insurance available to cover an eligible loss involving a
covered motorcycle. If the loss involves a non-owned substitute motorcycle or
trailer, the PMP responds on an excess basis, paying only after the primary
policy has paid its limit.
Paragraph A of this coverage part
explains that it will pay for necessary medical and funeral services incurred
by an insured suffering from accidental bodily injury. However, only expenses
for services provided within three years of the date of the accident are
covered.
Example: Connie, insured under a PMP,
is injured when her motorcycle hits a large pothole. Connie suffers multiple
serious cuts as well as a broken arm and leg. She is treated for the accident
after it occurred in June 2021. In August 2024 after suffering from years of
back pain, a doctor discovers a spine injury he attributes to her accident.
She has back surgery a couple weeks later. Although directly connected to her
2021 accident, none of Connie’s recent medical expenses are eligible for
coverage. The 2024
expenses are not covered by the PMP because they were incurred more than
three years from the accident date. |
|
Related Court Case:
Insured Alleges Ambiguous Med Pay Provision
Item B defines
insured as used in this coverage part as the named insured and spouse plus any
“family member.” However, they are insureds only when occupying a covered
motorcycle. They are also insureds if, while a pedestrian, they are struck by any
type of vehicle that is BOTH motorized and designed to operate on public
roadways. Finally, anyone else that qualifies as occupying a covered motorcycle
is also an insured.
Even if a
person is an insured, no coverage for bodily injury applies under the following
circumstances:
1. When the injury takes place
while the vehicle is being used to transport persons or property for income.
Note: The PMP does cover incidents in
which the operator is involved in either charitable or voluntary activity.
2. When it occurs while the insured
is on the job, and workers compensation coverage is either available or
required for the bodily injury.
3. When the bodily injury happens
while the insured is hit by a vehicle that is owned by the named insured (but
not shown on the policy as required), or by a vehicle that is regularly
available to him or her.
4. When the bodily injury happens
while an insured is hit by a vehicle that is owned by or is a vehicle that is
regularly available to a “family member.” However, this exclusion doesn’t apply
to a named insured or a resident spouse, nor does it apply to a vehicle that
meets the PMP definition of a covered motorcycle.
5. When injury occurs while the
injured person is occupying a vehicle without the belief that she or he has the
vehicle owner’s permission to do so. However, the exclusion does not affect
such situations involving an insured’s family member who is operating a covered
motorcycle that is owned by the named insured.
6. When injury is suffered while the
insured is in a vehicle that’s being used in an insured’s “business.” An
exception exists when the applicable business involves ranching or faming.
7. Any injury related to war of any
type
8. Any injury caused directly or
indirectly by a nuclear weapon, reaction radiation or contamination
9. This item bars coverage for
vehicles that are either in the midst of or preparing for any form of prearranged
competition.
This
exclusion includes an important exception. If an event or training is connected to a
Motorcycle Safety Foundation or any state agency course that is intended to improve
cycle operating skills, coverage still applies if a loss should occur.
10. The PMP specifically excludes coverage for any legal responsibility any
insured may have for operating or owning a vehicle when that vehicle is
involved with even minor delivery activity. Even food or newspaper delivery
activity bars the insured against the policy’s liability protection.
Note: An
exception is made for charitable or voluntary activity.
11. Any loss that occurs when the
motorcycle is operated by a person who is impaired by the use of either of the
following:
a. Alcohol
b. Any controlled substance
The level of alcohol influence is
based upon the protocol used by authorities in the applicable state where a
loss occurs.
With regard to controlled
substances, the use of any Controlled Substance(s) as defined by the Federal
Food and Drug Law at 21 U.S.C.A. Sections 811 and 812 brings about this
exclusion. Controlled Substances include, but are not limited to:
·
Cocaine
·
LSD
·
Marijuana
·
All narcotic
drugs
This
exclusion makes an exception for any loss involving the legitimate use of
prescription drugs by a person following the orders of a licensed health care
professional.
12. Any loss in which an insured was
committing a felonious activity.
13. Any loss that occurs when an
insured is operating a motorcycle with the intent to escape capture or arrest
by the authorities.
14. Any loss that occurs when an
insured operating the motorcycle does not have a valid driver’s license. A
driver’s permit, with regard to this exclusion, is treated as a valid license.
Paragraph A
explains that the monetary limit that appears on the policy declarations page
is the maximum amount of coverage that will apply to injuries suffered by any
individual that occur in a given accidental loss. The number of vehicles,
insureds, or claims involved in a given loss does not affect this maximum
amount. It is also unaffected by the number of vehicles or premiums appearing
on the declarations page. The details of a given loss may well affect how
payments may be distributed, but the maximum remains the maximum.
Paragraph B
of the Limit of Liability section explains that, regardless of whether coverage
exists under more than one coverage part (specifically parts A, B and/or C), no
duplicate payments will be made under the PMP. This limitation means that, even
if portions of a single claim qualify for coverage under Part B - Medical
Payments as well as Part A - Liability and/or Part C - Uninsured Motorists coverage, an insured will
not be paid more than once for any portion of his loss.
In the event that other sources
of medical payments insurance exist, Part B-Medical Payments Coverage of the
Personal Motorcycle Policy will pay on a basis that equals its share of the
total amount of insurance that is available to cover an eligible loss involving
an owned motorcycle.
Example: Kerry is injured in an accident. She is eligible for medical
payments coverage under two different policies. The PMP source one has limits
of $5,000 and a source of health coverage provides $8,000. The PMP will pay its
proportional share of the total loss amount. The proportion is based on its
share of total available coverage. In this example, the PMP would pay approximately
40% of the loss (limit of $5,000 divided by total amount available of $13,000). |
If the loss
involves an additional source of coverage written for a motorcycle (providing
medical payments and/or funeral costs protection), then the PMP responds on an
excess basis, paying only after any other available coverage has paid its
limit.
Related Court Case:
Insurer Covers Both Drivers in Accident; Deducts Medical Payments from
Settlement
Different
states vary on the issue of Uninsured (UM) and Underinsured (UIM) Motorist
coverage. The common differences include whether the coverage is mandatory,
what limits must be offered, the availability of underinsured coverage
(including if UIM is considered part of UM coverage), and if UM coverage can be
rejected.
Uninsured
motorist coverage has long been a major problem for insurers, and it looks like
it will remain a tremendous challenge for the automobile insurance industry.
Drivers often consider operating a vehicle to be a right. Unfortunately, many
such persons ignore the financial responsibility to take care of damages they
may cause while exercising that ill-conceived right. Insurance companies have a
very difficult time trying to price and control this loss exposure. One reason
for the difficulty is that the exposure is hard to predict. Other than
determining if a given territory has a higher number of uninsured drivers, how
can a company gain insight on the likelihood of a loss involving a driver who
is not insured?
Related
Article: Auto Uninsured and Underinsured Requirements
A. This part’s insuring agreement
obligates the issuing company to protect an “insured” against “bodily injury”
caused by an accident with an “uninsured motor vehicle.” In other words, an
insured can rely on his own PMP to take care of injuries resulting from an
accident where the driver who caused the injury doesn’t have the coverage to
take care of his or her legal obligation. However, this coverage part is not
bound by any judgment for damages that are determined by a lawsuit that’s filed
without the insurance company’s written consent.
B. This portion of the insuring
agreement defines who is considered an insured. An insured is the named insured
and resident spouse, any “family member,” and any other person “occupying”
“your covered motorcycle.” In addition, any person eligible for payment because
of bodily injury damages suffered by an insured is also an insured. An example of
such a person (such as the executor of an estate) is one who pays for the
funeral expenses of an insured who dies from bodily injury in an accident with
an uninsured motorist. Of course, no matter how well a policy tries to explain
who is considered an insured, anything can be questioned in court.
Related Court Case:
"Family Member Definition Held Not to Extend to Son"
C. This part of the insuring
agreement includes the broadest definition of a vehicle. Any land motor vehicle
or trailer qualifies as an “uninsured motor vehicle” as long as no bodily
injury liability policy or bond applies to the vehicle. Such a vehicle could
still qualify as an “uninsured motor vehicle” if a bond or policy does apply
but the writer of the coverage denies coverage or becomes insolvent. Finally, a
hit-and-run vehicle is also an “uninsured motor vehicle” when it hits the named
insured (includes resident spouse) or a family member, or any covered
motorcycle occupied by these classes of people, or it hits a covered motorcycle.
Ineligible Vehicles - Although the PMP’s definition
of an uninsured vehicle is broad, it doesn’t include any vehicle or equipment
that either belongs to or is regularly available to the named insured or any
family member, or any vehicle owned by a governmental entity. Vehicles used as
a residence, vehicles which operate upon crawlers or treads, or vehicles made
primarily for off-road use also are disqualified as uninsured motor vehicles.
Vehicles covered by legally permitted self-insurers (even after insolvency) are
also ineligible under this provision of the PMP.
A. The following situations bar
coverage for bodily injury:
1. No coverage exists for any
insured if he or she is hit by or hit while occupying an owned vehicle
(including a trailer) that isn’t protected by uninsured motorists coverage.
2. No family member is covered if
they are hit by or occupying a vehicle that is owned by the named insured, but
that is covered by any other policy.
3. No
coverage is provided to the named insured or any family member when he or she
occupies any vehicle. An exception applies when the vehicle being occupied
qualifies as a covered motorcycle.
B. No insured qualifies for
uninsured motorists coverage if a bodily injury claim is settled without the insurance
company’s consent. However, this applies only if the settlement hinders the
insurance company’s recovery rights. In the instance of an unapproved
settlement of a bodily injury claim, it is only excluded if the action
prejudiced (damaged or eliminated) the insurer's rights. This eliminates the
application of an exclusion when, for all intents, an insurer's position has
not been adversely affected by an insured’s action. Previously, certain losses
could have been denied, purely on technical grounds. Nationwide, courts have
been rejecting such results.
Also, there is no coverage for an
insured in a vehicle that’s transporting people or property for pay or for loss
to a vehicle while being used without permission. However, the question of
permission does not apply to a “family member” who is operating a vehicle that
qualifies as a “covered motorcycle.”
Related Court Case: Son
Did Not Qualify As A Permissive Driver
The PMP specifically excludes coverage for any legal responsibility any
insured may have for operating or owning a vehicle when that vehicle is
involved with, even minor, business activity. Even food or newspaper delivery
activity bars the insured against the policy’s liability protection.
Note: An
exception is made for charitable or voluntary activity.
C. No coverage exists if coverage
should be handled by either workers compensation or disability benefits law
This
exclusion is not affected by the status of the party providing such coverage
(either an insurance company or a self-insuring entity).
D. Payments are not made for
punitive or exemplary damages.
A. Paragraph A explains that the
monetary limit that appears on the policy declarations page is the maximum
amount of coverage that will apply to the damages from any single loss. This
maximum is not affected by the number of vehicles, insureds, or claims
involved, or the number of vehicles or premiums appearing on the declarations
page. The particulars of a given loss may well affect how payments may be
distributed, but the maximum remains the maximum.
B. Regardless of whether coverage
exists under more than one coverage part (specifically parts A or B), no
duplicate payments will be made under the PMP. This limitation means that, even
if portions of a single claim qualify for coverage under Part C - Uninsured
Motorists Coverage as well as Part B - Medical Payments and/or Part A -
Liability Coverage, an insured will not be paid more than once for any portion
of his loss. This limitation also applies to any coverage available under any
underinsured motorists coverage provided by
the policy.
Example: Harold was injured when hit by an uninsured driver. He is paid
$4,900 by his PMP insurer. Later, his insurer requires him to pay back $380,
the amount he was already paid under the Medical Payments portion of his
policy. |
C. The PMP won’t pay for a single element of
loss that already has been paid by any party responsible for that loss.
D. No coverage exists under this portion of
the policy if coverage should be handled by either a workers compensation or a
disability benefits law.
If other
sources of insurance or other policy provisions apply to an uninsured motorist
loss, this provision intends to make sure that such sources are contemplated
when compensating an insured for a loss.
1. This portion of the PMP
operates with a special constraint. It considers that the total amount of
coverage available to pay for losses involving uninsured motorists is no higher
than the greatest amount (whether on an excess or primary basis) provided for a
single vehicle.
2. Further, the total amount that
may be paid on the loss may not exceed the total amount of primary and excess
coverage available for any single vehicle. If the loss involves a non-owned vehicle,
the uninsured motorist coverage part responds on an excess basis, paying only
after the other available coverage has paid its limit (this is true even with
regard to vehicles that are temporary substitutes for listed vehicles).
Related Court Case:
Insurers Must Share Coverage of Wrongful Death Suit – illustrates problems in
interpreting how “other source” provisions apply.
3.
a. When
primary coverage is provided by the PMP, this policy will respond to an
eligible loss in the proportion it holds according to the total of all
primary-level coverage available to the covered vehicle.
3.
b. When excess
coverage is provided by the PMP, this policy will respond to an eligible loss
in the proportion it holds according to the total
of all excess-level coverage available to the covered vehicle.
A. If the
insurance company and an insured do not agree:
If the company
and their insured aren’t on the same wavelength regarding whether a loss
payment is due and/or how much is due in an uninsured motorist loss, the
argument may go to arbitration. However, both the company and the insured must
want the disagreement to be handled by this process, using representatives of
their own choosing. A judge may be called upon to select a third arbitrator if
that person isn’t selected by the first two arbitrators within 30 days.
Related Court Case:
“Insurer Must Accept Decision of Its Approved Umpire” – though not an auto case,
it illustrates the power of an arbitration clause.
B.
Distribution of costs
Each party
will handle their own out-of-pocket expenses, as well as share in the cost of
the third arbitrator. The arbitrators must follow the local rules of law in
their discussions.
C. Unless both parties agree
otherwise
The insurance company and the
insured must accept the decisions agreed on by any two arbitrators as legally
binding in the areas of determining a valid claim and the amount to be paid. An
exception is made if the arbitrated amount is greater than the minimum bodily
injury liability established by the applicable state’s financial responsibility
law. If this disparity occurs, either the insurer or the insured can insist on
going to trial. However, if no party contests the amount within 60 days, the
decision, regardless of the amount, is binding.
This section
is a serious departure from the earlier sections, because instead of liability
to other injured parties, it deals with actual damage to the named insured’s
covered vehicle and expenses incurred because of loss of use of the same.
A. Under paragraph A of the
insuring agreement, the Personal Motorcycle Policy agrees to protect “your
covered motorcycle” against accidental loss. Any payment includes compensation
for loss to motorcycle equipment but does not include the applicable
deductible. If you’re unlucky enough to have more than one covered vehicle
involved in the same collision loss, only a single, highest deductible will
count against any loss payment.
Example: The Clampdons were on vacation using their twin, Honda
motorcycles. They pull off and park their bikes together next to an RV camping
area. Minutes later, they hear a horrible crunching sound. To their horror, a
gigantic branch of an old oak had fallen and crushed both of their bikes. The
only good news is that they only had to pay a single $500 deductible for the
loss of both cycles. |
This section
clearly applies only to collision and other than collision losses, but only if
the policy’s declarations page shows a deductible choice to indicate that these
coverages apply.
B. “Collision” refers to your
covered motorcycle being either hit or been hit by another vehicle or by some
other item. It’s implied that the event has to result in damage to your vehicle.
It also covers the damage to the covered cycle when it flips or is otherwise
upset.
“Other than collision” simply refers to those events that aren’t
collision. The PMP lists 10 events that qualify as other than collision losses.
If your covered motorcycle is damaged by items falling from the sky, fire,
theft, explosion or earthquake, windstorm, hail or flood, vandalism, rioting,
contact with birds and animals, or if glass has broken, you’ve experienced an
other than collision loss. The PMP contains an option for losses involving
glass. If any vehicle glass is broken during a collision, an insured may choose
to have it covered under the collision portion of the policy.
C. Paragraph
C of PMP's Coverage D responds to losses involving custom equipment. Under the
policy, the term refers to a variety of property that is commonly used with
motorcycles such as saddlebags, enhancers (to a covered motorcycle's body,
engine and/or exhaust), fairings, windshields, luggage racks, bars (both light
& sissy [extended] bars), safety guards, roll bars, custom plating
(including plated exhausts), seats, wheels, tires, custom chrome, murals,
paintwork, graphics (as well as decals) and side cars.
Related Article: Automotive Glossary
The PMP, while protecting a host of custom equipment, also excludes the
following property for custom equipment protection:
a. Any
and all equipment, furnishings, and parts from an original manufacturer
b. All
equipment, parts, and furnishings (other than that made by an original
manufacturer) that was part of a covered motorcycle at the time it was
purchased or acquired by a named insured.
c. Similar
equipment, parts and furnishings which replace items provided by a motorcycle's
original manufacturer
d. Electronics
involved with handling sound, video, or data. Such equipment is ineligible for
consideration as custom equipment even if it is related to property referenced
in items a., b., or c. above.
e. Any
form of media related any form of electronics designed for handling sound, video,
or data.
f. Any
devices designed for dealing with traffic radar or lasers.
The PMP's Coverage D extends its protection
to items used by motorcycle operators to reduce the chances of injury during
motorcycle accidents. The following, as well as similar property, qualify for
protection:
A. Motorcycle helmets (including
wireless headsets that facilitate operator/passenger communication)
B. Protective riding clothing
C. Riding boots
D. Riding gloves
E. Protective eye and ear wear
The protection applies to such apparel worn
by the named insured as well as such property that is worn by a passenger. The
latter is protected only at the post-loss request of the named insured.
However, coverage only applies to damage
resulting from collision losses that take place while a covered motorcycle is
occupied. The PMP declarations page also must indicate that collision coverage
has been purchased. The maximum protection provided by the additional coverage
provision is $1,000 for a single, eligible loss. This maximum applies
regardless of the scope of loss that occurs to eligible property.
Payment under the additional coverage
provision neither requires a deductible, nor does it affect the amount of
protection provided by any of PMP coverage part.
Part D -
Coverage for Damage to Your Motorcycle will not pay for:
1. Loss to a covered motorcycle
that occurs while it is used for hire to transport persons or goods. An
exception exists for charitable or voluntary activities.
2. Damage resulting from the covered
motorcycle’s aging, extremely cold weather, mechanical or electrical breakdown,
or road damage.
|
Example: While riding his cycle, a tire
blowout causes John to crash. The $2,900 that his motorcycle insurer pays for
damage to his vehicle does not include replacement of his tires, which blew because
of deterioration from use. |
An exception
is made for such damage that is related to the total theft of a covered cycle.
3. There’s no coverage for any loss
caused by radioactive contamination, nuclear weapons, war, insurrection, rebellion,
or revolution.
4. Part D of the PMP does not cover
loss to electronic equipment designed for reproducing, receiving, or
transmitting signals (both audio and visual). The PMP specifically references
that the exclusion applies to equipment such as radios, tape decks, stereos, or
compact disc players. Other items that are becoming common components are also
barred from coverage such as navigation devices, phones, computers, TVs, scanners,
and similar equipment. However, there are exceptions. There IS coverage for
equipment IF the equipment is permanently installed in your covered motorcycle.
Also, loss to a helmet is covered subject to the Rider Safety Apparel
Additional Coverage limit.
5. This exclusion is for any media
that is used with such equipment as well as any accessories used with equipment
that reproduces sound, receives, or transmits (audio and/or visual) signals
that are described in item 4 above.
**A
handlebar mounted GPS is an accessory that does not qualify for coverage under
the PMP.
6. No coverage is available for covered
motorcycles listed on the policy when they are destroyed or taken by military
or civil authorities.
Of course,
an exception is made for the financial interests of loss payees. It isn’t in
the public interest to deny protection to lenders because of the illegal acts
of their borrowers.
7. Any equipment used to detect or
locate radar or lasers isn’t protected if it is lost or damaged.
8. All custom equipment is
excluded from coverage that exceeds $1,500. Examples of such items are special
handlebar grips, chromed items, custom wheels, fairings, etc. These items
should be separately endorsed since their value is rarely included in the
vehicle value used to rate the basic physical damage coverage. ISO provides a
special endorsement where these items can be listed and rated.
Related
Article: Personal Motorcycle Policy Endorsements
9. No
protection is provided when a covered cycle loss has any connection to an
insured’s business with a special exemption for ranching or farming use.
|
Example: Ramya turns in a loss. Her
motorcycle was damaged when she and the bike fell and tumbled on a road.
Rhianna owns a ranch. The bike is used, primarily, for patrolling her miles
of fencing for breaks or gaps. The loss would be eligible for protection. |
10. The PMP is not meant to cover
racing exposures. This item bars coverage for vehicles that are in the midst of
preparing for any form of competition, including nonsanctioned skills competitions.
This
exclusion includes an important exception. If an event or training is connected to a
Motorcycle Safety Foundation or any state agency course that is intended to improve
cycle operating skills, coverage still applies if a loss should occur.
11. The PMP
specifically excludes coverage for any loss to a covered motorcycle involved
with food or newspaper delivery activity.
Note: An
exception is made for charitable or voluntary activity.
12. Any loss that occurs when the
motorcycle is operated by a person who is impaired by the use of:
a. Alcohol
b. Any controlled substance
The level of alcohol influence is
based upon the protocol used by authorities in the applicable state where a
loss occurs.
With regard to controlled
substances, the use of any Controlled Substance(s) as defined by the Federal
Food and Drug Law at 21 U.S.C.A. Sections 811 and 812 brings about this
exclusion. Controlled Substances include, but are not limited to:
·
Cocaine
·
LSD
·
Marijuana
·
All narcotic
drugs
This
exclusion makes an exception for any loss involving the legitimate use of
prescription drugs by a person following the orders of a licensed health care
professional.
13. Coverage
is barred for any loss involving renting or leasing a covered motorcycle to any
entity (person or organization) other than the named insured or a family
member.
Example: Joey escapes injury when he jumps off a motorcycle before it
goes over a steep hill, substantially damaging the cycle. The claim for
damages is denied. The motorcycle is owned by Loretta who received $150 from
Joey to let him rent it for a long weekend. The loss is ineligible for
coverage. |
A. The PMP does have restrictions
on the total amount of coverage available for a loss to a covered motorcycle.
It will pay no more than the lesser of the following two values:
1. The actual cash value of the covered
property that has been stolen or damaged.
2. The total cost of repairing or
replacing the stolen or damaged covered property. This provision includes the
option of settling a loss by using property of like kind and quality.
This section also explains that
the maximum available for the loss of custom equipment that, at the time of a loss,
is located either in or on a motorcycle that qualifies for coverage under the PMP
is $1,500.
Example: Paula underestimated her speed and did not brake in time to
avoid slamming into the back of a furniture moving company's truck. The truck
was undamaged, but the front end of Paula' motorcycle is seriously smashed
up, including the handle-bar mounted GPS. The GPS portion of the loss ($210)
is not eligible for coverage under Paula's PMP. However, the $950 loss to the
custom handlebars is covered. |
B. Any settlement is subject to an
adjustment for a vehicle’s decreasing market value (depreciation) and physical
condition when determining its actual cash value after a total loss.
C. If the repair or replacement of
a covered vehicle results in an insured being better off than before the loss,
the PMP won’t pay the value of the improvement.
While not
defined, the words “of like kind and quality” can have a significant impact on
settlements. As the cost of vehicles and vehicle parts continues to increase,
insurers face more pressures to find options that indemnify their insureds
while not “breaking the bank.” As it is with homeowners insurance, the need to
repair damaged property often puts auto insurers in the position of having to
actually improve an insured’s position after a loss. Use of the terms “like
kind and quality,” allows carriers options other than the problematic use of new
parts to make repairs and then attempt to make adjustments to the value of the
settlement. Requesting insureds to participate in loss settlements above their
coverage deductibles is a hard sell, so the option of introducing the “like
kind and quality” concept made increasing sense, at least from the insurer’s
side of the equation.
This
provision discusses a company’s options in making a settlement on a loss to a
covered vehicle. The settlement may be in the form of a cash payment, repaired property,
or replacement property. The insurer has the option to return any stolen
property to the named insured or to the latest address shown on the
declarations page. If such stolen property is returned, the insurer must pay the
cost of returning it and the cost of repairing any damage to it. Further,
should the company exercise the right to keep the property; it has to be at a
price that’s acceptable to both parties. Finally, if the settlement is made in
cash, the total has to include any sales tax.
A carrier
for hire or a bailee for hire is not permitted to benefit from the PMP.
This
provision prevents the PMP from being used by entities that are outside the
intended, contractual parties. Without this clause parties who haven’t been
rated or underwritten for coverage would secure protection against more
exposures than contemplated. Such persons or organizations can’t piggyback
their obligations to the PMP when their having custody or control of a covered
motorcycle is due to a commercial transaction.
Related
Court Case: "Car Wash Assumes Liability When Customer
Relinquishes Vehicle for Service"
This
provision is to make sure that any payment under Part D of the Personal Motorcycle
Policy takes other sources of loss payment into account. If other insurance
policies, provisions or sources of recovery apply to a physical damage loss,
the policy will only pay its proportion of the total available coverage.
The
proportional payment response is only for owned vehicles. If other sources of
payment exist for a loss involving a non-owned vehicle, Part D of the PMP
responds on an excess basis. It is excess over every other available
source of payment, including the policy of the party that owns an applicable
vehicle that was acting as a temporary substitute for the named insured's
vehicle.
The
provision to pay its proportionate share on owned motorcycle losses effectively
assures that the policy won’t pay more than the limits of liability listed on
the declarations page. Of course, it has no other way to control the amount
paid by other sources.
Related
Court Case: Parties Dispute Applying “Other Insurance”
A. This system works quite
similarly to an arbitration clause, except that the only point of dispute is
the amount of payment, rather than the amount of payment and/or whether payment
is due. This provision may be invoked when the company and the insured don’t
agree on the amount of the loss. Each party must select its own qualified (competent
and impartial) appraiser. The two appraisers then select an umpire. The
appraisers then submit their opinion of the actual cash value and the amount of
the loss. If they don’t reach agreement, they submit this information to the umpire.
An agreement by any two persons is binding on both parties.
The company
and the insured have to pay for the expenses of their own appraiser, as well as
equally share the expenses of the umpire.
B. No other insurer rights are
affected by their agreeing to an appraisal. For instance, if another party has
some responsibility for the loss, the insurer, after paying the appraised
amount of loss, may still subrogate the claim.
This section
explains what an insured must do in order to fulfill his or her obligations
once a loss occurs. It is important that these conditions be met, since failing
to comply may relieve an insurer from having to pay for a loss. However, coverage
may be lost only if the failure to comply with obligations harms or violates
(prejudices) the insurer's position. In other words, loss of protection is not
triggered by a mere technicality.
A. Notification. The insured must
tell the company the accident details as soon as possible. The notification may
be to an agent, and, ideally, should include the identity and addresses of any
people hurt in the accident, as well as accident witnesses.
Paragraph A
is critical, since it initiates the entire claims process, and it gives the
insurer its first and best opportunity to control the expense of the claim.
B. If an insured wants coverage,
he or she must:
1. Assist the insurer in the
claim’s investigation and settlement, as well as help with defending against
any claim or suit.
2. Immediately send the company
copies of ANY material received that’s related to the accident.
3. Agree to attend as many:
a. Physical exams, involving
doctors selected by the insurer and/or
b. Interviews under oath
as are
reasonably requested by the insurer. These requirements are at the insurer’s
expense.
4. Permit the insurer complete access to medical and other records that
relate to the accident.
5. Give the insurer any requested
proof of loss.
The items in
paragraph B. allow an insurer to evaluate whether a loss payment is due and how
much has to be paid. This area has a lot of potential for straining relations
between the insurer and the insured, since the two parties may differ over what
is “reasonable.” The insured may quickly become concerned with their privacy,
as well as their community standing. It is important that this provision spells
out an insured’s contractual obligations in order to document their cooperation
and possibly mitigate any hard feelings over repeated requests for help or
information.
Related
Court Case: Insured Fails To Cooperate
C. If the loss involves uninsured
motorists coverage, the insured is further obligated to notify the police
quickly if the accident was caused by a hit-and-run driver, and to send the
insurer copies of any legal papers should a suit be filed. Hit-and-run losses
are always difficult to investigate and are always favorites for exaggerated, inaccurate,
or fraudulent claims. The requirement that such losses be immediately reported
to the police is a way to guard against claim problems.
D. If the loss involves collision
or other than collision coverage, the insured is further obligated to:
1. Protect the property from
further loss. The company is obligated to reimburse the insured if any
additional expense is involved.
2. Quickly notify the police if
the covered vehicle is stolen.
Example: Carla is in a collision while
riding her motorcycle to work. She is uninjured, but the motorcycle is too
damaged to use. She trades accident information with the other person
involved in the accident. She also gets approval from her insurer to have the
cycle towed from the scene. She can't miss work, so she leaves the scene
after providing details to a local towing service. The towing company calls a
couple hours later to tell her that the cycle was not at the location and
must have been stolen. Carla hangs up and immediately calls the police to
report the theft. |
3. Allow the company to inspect
and evaluate the damaged property BEFORE it is repaired or removed. Preserving
the damaged property after a loss is extremely important.
In the last
instance, having any damage repaired or getting rid of the damaged property is
an extremely serious breach of contract on the part of the insured, and could
easily result in an insurer’s refusal to make payment. If the insured vehicle
is repaired or disposed of, the insurer has no chance to evaluate whether
coverage was due, nor determine how much was due.
The PMP states that an insured’s
bankruptcy or insolvency doesn’t release the company from any obligations under
this policy.
A. This states that the policy is a
complete agreement that can’t be changed, except by the company issuing an
endorsement.
This is important.
If the insured were allowed to change the policy, it would make it difficult
for insurers to handle claims and to earn a profit. Fortunately, insurers are
eager to help their customers make valid changes to their policy to fit their
current circumstances.
B. The second paragraph of this
provision explains that the policy premium was based on a certain set of facts.
If any of this information changes, it could affect the rating of the motorcycle
policy, and the insured’s premium may be changed. Items that could cause the
policy’s cost to change include the number, type, or use of vehicles; the
operators using the cars; where the vehicles are kept; and coverage, deductible,
or limit changes.
Finally, paragraph
B. of this provision makes a reference that falls outside of the policy. It
states that if a rating change is necessary, the change will be performed in compliance
with the applicable company’s filed rating plan and rules.
C. This part is a liberalization
clause for the benefit of consumers. If a company does something to expand the
coverage under the PMP without charging additional premium, then the change
immediately applies to all similar parties in a given state. This provision
does not apply in instances where changes both expand and restrict coverage
(whether such change is done via a new coverage edition or an amendatory
endorsement).
This
provision is particularly brief and straightforward. The insurer advises that,
if an insured speaks or acts with the intent to mislead others regarding any
loss or claim, the insurer can deny coverage. Of course, this provision of the
insurance contract is implied throughout the policy.
While it is questionable that
such wording ever deters fraud, at least it continues to act as a basis for
denying coverage when discovered.
Example: Ben reports that his motorcycle was stolen from in front of a
restaurant while he and a date were enjoying dinner. After investigating the
loss, his claim is denied. The insurer discovers that Ben had fallen way
behind in payments for the cycle and he arranged for it to be stolen by a
friend. |
Related Court Case: Insurer
Denies Car Theft Claim
A. The provision forces the parties
to use all of the tools within the PMP before a suit is attempted. In other
words, an insured, disputing the existence of liability or the amount that
should be paid, cannot skip arbitration or appraisal or cooperation with the company
or providing proof of loss, etc., and go straight to filing a suit. Further,
even after compliance with all of the policy provisions has occurred, no action
can be filed unless there’s been a written agreement that the insured is
responsible for a loss payment OR the amount of the payment has been settled
via judicial proceedings.
Related
Court Case: Filing Appraisal Not Lawsuit Prerequisite
B. Paragraph B of this provision
denies any person or organization’s right to bring action against the insurer
to determine if the insured is liable for an accident. This paragraph is needed
to limit the persons who may rightfully expect performance under the contract.
Without this clause, the PMP would provide an umbrella of protection to parties
who, rightfully, should secure their own protection.
This provision states that, while
an insurer will fulfill any valid obligation to make payment under the policy,
when payment is made, it acquires the insured’s right to recover payment from
another responsible party. Just as important as acquiring this right is the
duty it imposes on the insured. The insured must cooperate fully with the
insurer to pursue recovery AND must be certain that he or she does nothing to
undermine (prejudice) this right. However, this provision doesn’t apply under
Coverage Part D - Damage to Your Motorcycle when the responsible party is a
person who operates the covered motorcycle with permission (including parties
who, under the circumstances, felt they were permitted to use a covered vehicle.
Related Court Case: Company's
Failure to Act Voids Subrogation Rights
Paragraph B
of this provision explains that if the company compensates the insured for a
loss and then collects payment from the responsible party for the same damages,
the insured HAS to hold onto the money on behalf of the insurance company and
then reimburse the company up to the amount of the settlement.
This duty of both parties
regarding subrogation has been long established.
In order for the PMP to apply to
a loss, the loss must happen within the policy period shown on the declarations
page and within the territory shown. The territory described in the Personal Motorcycle
Policy includes the
A. Cancellation
1. The insured has it simple. All
she or he has to do is either return the policy to the company or send prior
written notice of the date the policy is to be canceled. The insured can
request cancellation at any time during the policy period.
2. It’s a little more complicated
for the insurer to cancel coverage. The company has to mail written notice to
the named insured at the address shown on the policy declarations page. The
insurer must give 20 days’ advance notice of cancellation unless the
cancellation is for not paying the premium or if it is done within the first 60
days of coverage (new business). In the latter instances, the insurer may give
10 days’ advance notice.
Related Court Case: Cancellation
Notice Must Allow Required Time
3. After new business has been in
effect for 60 days or after a renewal of a continued policy, cancellation may
take place only for nonpayment of premium or after the license of the named
insured or a regular driver of the covered vehicles is suspended or revoked.
Any suspension or revocation must have occurred either during the last policy
period or, if the policy period is other than annual, since the last
anniversary date. Another reason for cancellation is any significant
misrepresentation set forth to get coverage.
Note: A misrepresentation has to be important
enough to affect a company’s decision to accept coverage. Minor items may call for premium adjustments, but not
cancellation.
B. Non-renewal
This option
to end coverage is just a company option. However, if an insured sent in
advance a written notice to end coverage at the policy’s expiration date, it
technically would be an insured’s request to non-renew.
In any case,
if a company doesn’t want to continue coverage, it has to give an insured at
least 20 days’ advance notice of non-renewal. If the policy period is less than
six months, coverage may be non-renewed at any six-month period after the
anniversary of the original effective date. If the policy period is annual or
longer, the policy may be non-renewed at any anniversary. It is critical that an
insured understand the rules of the company and state provisions since the
differences center around the amount of notice (nearly always longer) and have
specific reasons for non-renewing. Further, for both cancellations and
non-renewals, many states require that the legal notice includes the reason for
the action and any available recourse.
Related
Court Case: “Nonrenewal Held Effective When Statutory Notice
Requirements Are Observed”
C. Automatic Termination
This section
of the termination provision allows for coverage to end without any written
request or notice being required. If a company sends a renewal policy, and if
the insured or insured’s representative doesn’t accept it, coverage ends at the
latest expiration date. Nonpayment of the renewal premium is considered
non-acceptance. If an insured obtains another insurance policy, coverage
automatically terminates at the effective date of the replacing coverage.
D. Other Termination Provisions
1. Paragraph D of the Termination provision
informs the insured that a cancellation notice may be delivered or mailed and
that proof of mailing acts as sufficient proof of notice.
IMPORTANT: Many states mandate how the
notice has to be delivered (for instance, registered or certified mail), so you
need to be aware of state law and any form that amends or replaces this
provision.
2. The insured is also told that
the company may be refunding the premium if a policy is canceled, but that the
refund transaction has no effect on the cancellation.
Example: Vern received notice that his
policy terminated on 7/3/24. He is in an accident on 7/9/24 and he receives a
premium refund on 7/12/24. Vern submits a claim, arguing that his coverage
should have lasted until the date he gets his refund. The insurer confirms
that the refund's processing had no impact and that the termination date was
still 7/3/24. |
3. Whatever date that appears as
the cancellation date in a given notice is treated as the policy period's
ending date. This may seem like a technicality, but it aligns the insurance company's
intent with any policy reference to "policy period."
A
policyholder can assign his rights and duties under the PMP to another person,
BUT ONLY with the written permission of the insurer.
There is one
exception to the rule of having to get the insurer’s permission to assign a
policy: if the policyholder dies. In this event, this policy provision
automatically transfers coverage either to a surviving spouse (if he or she
lives at the same address) or the deceased’s legal representative. Either party
achieves the status of named insured. However, the legal representative is
protected only to the extent of his or her duties to maintain or operate the
covered vehicles.
The insurer
will only recognize such a transfer until the policy’s expiration date. The
working assumption is that appropriate coverage reflecting the change in
circumstances will be obtained or that coverage will either be terminated or
allowed to expire.
What happens if the insurer
issues more than one policy to an insured and all of the policies are available
to respond to the same accident? This provision designates the company’s total
liability to its insured. The total amount that the company is obligated to pay
equals the highest limit of insurance written under any single, applicable
policy.